2020 A/L Physics Past Paper · Question 29 (English Medium)

A steadily increasing magnetic field — induced e.m.f. against the rate of change

A conducting loop is placed perpendicular to a steadily increasing magnetic field, as shown in the figure. Which of the following graphs best represents the variation of the e.m.f. (E)(E) induced in the loop with the rate of change of the magnetic flux density (R)(R)?

  1. (1) E=0E = 0 (along the horizontal axis)
  2. (2) A curve rising from the origin and levelling off
  3. (3) EE constant (a horizontal line)
  4. (4) A curve rising from the origin, bending upward
  5. (5) A straight line through the origin
Answer and explanation

Answer: (5) A straight line through the origin

What the question asks

We must find: the graph showing how the e.m.f. EE induced in a conducting loop of fixed area varies with the rate of change R=dBdtR = \dfrac{dB}{dt} of the magnetic flux density.

Relevant theory

The magnetic flux across a certain space in a magnetic field is a measurement of the number of lines of force across that space.

Electromagnetic induction can be briefly introduced as a phenomenon where an electromotive force is produced between the ends of a conducting coil or any other conductor when the magnetic flux intersecting is changing.

The magnitude of the electromotive force induced in a conducting coil or a circuit at any instant is directly proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux or the flux linkage number intersecting it at that instant.

The direction of the induced electromotive force is such that its current flows in a direction opposing the change of flux causing it.

Required equations

ϕ=BA\phi = BA

E=dϕdt=A dBdtE = \frac{d\phi}{dt} = A\,\frac{dB}{dt}

E=ARE = AR

Reasoning and calculation

Axes: the horizontal axis is the rate of change of the magnetic flux density RR (T s−1\text{T s}^{-1}), the vertical axis is the induced e.m.f. EE (V). These are not BB and time — they are a rate and its effect.

Starting point: if R=0R = 0, however strong the field, it is not changing; since the flux is not changing, E=0E = 0. So the graph starts from the origin.

Sections: the loop's area AA and its orientation do not change; across the whole range of RR the same relation E=ARE = AR holds — there is no point where the behaviour changes, just one section.

Behaviour in that section: EE is directly proportional to RR — if RR doubles, EE doubles; if RR triples, EE triples.

Boundary values: at R=0R = 0: E=0E = 0; e.g. A=0.1 m2A = 0.1\ \text{m}^2, R=0.3 T s−1R = 0.3\ \text{T s}^{-1}: E=0.03 VE = 0.03\ \text{V}. At larger RR the relation still does not change — no levelling off, no bending.

Slope, curvature, sign: slope dEdR=A\dfrac{dE}{dR} = A — constant, positive; no curvature; for R>0R > 0, E>0E > 0 (magnitude; Lenz's law gives the direction — the current in the loop opposes the growing field).

Reading the options

Comparing with the options: a straight line starting at the origin, of constant slope — only option (5) satisfies both conditions (E=0E = 0 at R=0R = 0; E∝RE \propto R).

Why the other options fail

E=0E = 0 for every RR — this says induction does not occur in a changing field.

As RR increases, the rise in EE slows down — a levelling-off curve.

Even at R=0R = 0, E≠0E \neq 0 — an e.m.f. with an unchanging flux.

An upward-bending curve, like E∝R2E \propto R^2.

Conclusion

E=ARE = AR

ϕ=BA\phi = BA, with AA constant: E=AdBdt=ARE = A\dfrac{dB}{dt} = AR — E∝RE \propto R, a straight line through the origin — the answer is (5).

Assuming the induced e.m.f. depends on the strength of the magnetic field (BB) itself.

The e.m.f. depends only on the rate at which the flux changes: E=AdBdtE = A\dfrac{dB}{dt}.

தமிழ் · සිංහල