2022 A/L Physics Past Paper · Question 13 (English Medium)

Momentum against de Broglie wavelength

Which of the following graphs best represents the variation of momentum (p)(p) of a particle with its de Broglie wavelength (λ)(\lambda)?

  1. (1) Graph (1)
  2. (2) Graph (2)
  3. (3) Graph (3)
  4. (4) Graph (4)
  5. (5) Graph (5)
Answer and explanation

Answer: (1) Graph (1)

What the question asks

We want: the graph of pp against λ\lambda for a moving particle.

What each letter means:

pp (kg m s−1\text{kg m s}^{-1}): the momentum of the particle.

λ\lambda (m\text{m}): the de Broglie wavelength of the particle.

hh (J s\text{J s}): the Planck constant, a fixed number.

Relevant theory

According to de Broglie's argument this relationship should hold for particle waves also.

This is known as the de Broglie wavelength of the particle.

For example, think of a bus trip of a fixed distance.

Speed times time always gives the same distance. So the faster the bus goes, the less time it takes.

Wavelength and momentum are tied in the same way. Their product is always one fixed number.

p λ=hp\,\lambda = h

In words: momentum times wavelength is always the Planck constant. So more momentum means a shorter wavelength.

Required equations

λ=hp\lambda = \dfrac{h}{p}

p=hλp = \dfrac{h}{\lambda}

Reasoning and calculation

Now draw p=hλp = \dfrac{h}{\lambda}.

Take a small λ\lambda. Then pp is very large.

Double λ\lambda. Then pp becomes half.

Double it again. Then pp becomes half again. It keeps getting smaller but never reaches zero.

Check the five graphs against this curve.

Graph (1) falls steeply at first and then flattens. It never touches the λ\lambda axis. It matches.

Graph (2) is a rising line, graph (3) is a falling line that hits zero, graph (4) rises and graph (5) is flat.

None of these halves pp each time λ\lambda doubles.

Checks

l∗pl * p

Does it make sense?

A fast, heavy ball has a large pp. Its wavelength is so tiny that we never see it behave like a wave.

An electron has a small pp. Its wavelength is big enough to measure. That is why electrons show wave effects.

Conclusion

graph (1)\text{graph }(1)

p λ=hp\,\lambda = h is a fixed number, so pp falls as λ\lambda grows and never reaches zero.

The answer is (1).

When two quantities multiply to a fixed number, one goes down as the other goes up, and the graph is a curve that never touches the axes.

Test the graph: double λ\lambda and see if pp is halved.

Exam tip

தமிழ் · සිංහල