2020 A/L Physics Past Paper · Question 50 (English Medium)

Five parallel plates — the equivalent capacitance between X and Y

Five thin flat metal plates, each of area AA, are arranged parallel to each other in vacuum with equal spacing dd between them. If, as shown in the figure, conducting wires are used to connect plate PP to plate SS and plate RR to plate TT, what is the equivalent capacitance between the terminals XX and YY?

  1. (1) 2ε0Ad\dfrac{2\varepsilon_0 A}{d}
  2. (2) 5ε0A3d\dfrac{5\varepsilon_0 A}{3d}
  3. (3) 4ε0A5d\dfrac{4\varepsilon_0 A}{5d}
  4. (4) ε0A2d\dfrac{\varepsilon_0 A}{2d}
  5. (5) ε0A5d\dfrac{\varepsilon_0 A}{5d}
Answer and explanation

Answer: (2) 5ε0A3d\dfrac{5\varepsilon_0 A}{3d}

What the question asks

We must find: the equivalent capacitance between terminals XX (on plate QQ) and YY (on plate RR), with wires joining PP–SS and RR–TT.

Given information

Given: five plates P,Q,R,S,TP, Q, R, S, T, each of area AA; equal gap dd between neighbouring plates; vacuum (εr=1\varepsilon_r = 1); XX is on plate QQ and YY is on plate RR.

Relevant theory

Consider a capacitor consisting of two parallel plates each of area. A placed at a distance d apart and having a charge Q spread uniformly over each one as shown.

Hence the capacitance of a capacitor is the ratio its charge subtending to the potential difference between its plates.

Reasoning and calculation

Setup: each facing pair of plates is a parallel-plate capacitor — four gaps PQ,QR,RS,STPQ, QR, RS, ST; in vacuum each one is C0=ε0AdC_0 = \dfrac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}.

Symmetry: all four gaps share the same AA and the same dd — so all four equal C0C_0; what differs is only which two terminals each gap sits between.

Equal-potential points: plates joined by a wire sit at one potential. There are three nodes — X={Q}X = \{Q\}, Y={R,T}Y = \{R, T\}, and a floating node F={P,S}F = \{P, S\}. So QRQR: XX–YY; PQPQ: FF–XX; RSRS: YY–FF; STST: FF–YY.

Reducing: RSRS and STST are both between FF and YY — the same potential difference, so they are in parallel (charges add, C=QVC = \dfrac{Q}{V}). That combination is in series with PQPQ through node FF — since FF is isolated its net charge is zero, so the same charge passes through both and the potential differences add. That whole branch is in parallel with QRQR between XX and YY.

Required equations

C0=ε0AdC_0 = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}

C=C1+C2C = C_1 + C_2

1C=1C1+1C2\frac{1}{C} = \frac{1}{C_1} + \frac{1}{C_2}

2C02C_0

CRS+CST=2C0C_{RS} + C_{ST} = 2C_0

23C0\frac{2}{3}C_0

C0×2C0C0+2C0=2C03\frac{C_0 \times 2C_0}{C_0 + 2C_0} = \frac{2C_0}{3}

CXY=C0+2C03C_{XY} = C_0 + \frac{2C_0}{3}

CXY=5C03=5ε0A3dC_{XY} = \frac{5C_0}{3} = \frac{5\varepsilon_0 A}{3d}

Circuit rule (charge conservation): if VV is applied between XX and YY, the floating node FF sits at V3\dfrac{V}{3}; the charge on QRQR is C0VC_0V, on PQPQ it is 23C0V\dfrac{2}{3}C_0V — the total from XX is 53C0V\dfrac{5}{3}C_0V, so C=QV=5C03C = \dfrac{Q}{V} = \dfrac{5C_0}{3}.

Reading the options

Comparing with the options: 5ε0A3d\dfrac{5\varepsilon_0 A}{3d} — option (2).

Checks

C0+C0∗2∗C0/(C0+2∗C0)C0 + C0 * 2 * C0 / (C0 + 2 * C0)

Second way (charge accounting): let the floating node be at VFV_F; its net charge is zero: C0(V−VF)=2C0VF⇒VF=V3C_0(V - V_F) = 2C_0 V_F \Rightarrow V_F = \dfrac{V}{3}. The charge from XX is C0V+C0(V−V3)=53C0VC_0V + C_0\left(V - \dfrac{V}{3}\right) = \dfrac{5}{3}C_0V ✓.

Boundary check: the answer is larger than C0C_0 (what QRQR alone would give), and smaller than 4C04C_0 (if all four were simply in parallel) ✓.

Conclusion

CXY=5ε0A3dC_{XY} = \frac{5\varepsilon_0 A}{3d}

CXY=C0+C0⋅2C03C0=53⋅ε0AdC_{XY} = C_0 + \dfrac{C_0 \cdot 2C_0}{3C_0} = \dfrac{5}{3}\cdot\dfrac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d} — the answer is (2).

Looking only at the order of the plates and assuming all the gaps are in series (or all in parallel).

First mark the equal-potential nodes made by the wires; then check which two nodes each neighbouring pair actually sits between.

தமிழ் · සිංහල