2020 A/L Physics Past Paper · Question 33 (English Medium)

A two-way switch — the internal resistance that gives equal power in both resistors

Using a two-way switch KK as shown in the figure, a cell of e.m.f. EE and internal resistance rr can be connected in series with either a resistor of 8 Ω8\ \Omega or one of 2 Ω2\ \Omega. If the power dissipated in each resistor is the same, what is the value of the internal resistance rr?

  1. (1) 2 Ω2\ \Omega
  2. (2) 4 Ω4\ \Omega
  3. (3) 5 Ω5\ \Omega
  4. (4) 6 Ω6\ \Omega
  5. (5) 8 Ω8\ \Omega
Answer and explanation

Answer: (2) 4 Ω4\ \Omega

Given information

Given: a cell of e.m.f. EE, internal resistance rr; switch KK connects either R1=8 ΩR_1 = 8\ \Omega or R2=2 ΩR_2 = 2\ \Omega in series with the cell; in both positions the power dissipated in the resistor is the same.

What the question asks

We must find: the internal resistance rr.

Relevant theory

The electromotive force of a cell is defined as the amount of form of energy existing in the cell which gets converted into electrical energy when a unit electric charge passes through a circuit which includes the cell.

Aresistance acts against the flow of the current inside the cell and it is called the internal resistance of the cell. This resistance exists in series with the resistance of the external circuit.

E = IR + Ir

P=VI

Required equations

I=ER+rI = \frac{E}{R + r}

P=I2R=E2R(R+r)2P = I^2R = \frac{E^2R}{(R + r)^2}

P8=P2P_8 = P_2

Applying it to this question

Plan: (1) the current in each position; (2) the power in each resistor; (3) equate the two and solve for rr. Even without knowing EE, it cancels because E2E^2 appears on both sides.

Reasoning and calculation

8E2(8+r)2\frac{8E^2}{(8 + r)^2}

I1=E8+r,P8=I12×8I_1 = \frac{E}{8 + r},\quad P_8 = I_1^2 \times 8

2E2(2+r)2\frac{2E^2}{(2 + r)^2}

I2=E2+r,P2=I22×2I_2 = \frac{E}{2 + r},\quad P_2 = I_2^2 \times 2

8E2(8+r)2=2E2(2+r)2  ⇒  4(8+r)2=1(2+r)2\frac{8E^2}{(8 + r)^2} = \frac{2E^2}{(2 + r)^2} \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{4}{(8 + r)^2} = \frac{1}{(2 + r)^2}

28+r=12+r\frac{2}{8 + r} = \frac{1}{2 + r}

2(2+r)=8+r  ⇒  4+2r=8+r2(2 + r) = 8 + r \;\Rightarrow\; 4 + 2r = 8 + r

44

r=8−4r = 8 - 4

Comparing with the options: r=4 Ωr = 4\ \Omega — option (2). This is not the average of 2 Ω2\ \Omega and 8 Ω8\ \Omega; it is the square root of their product.

Checks

8∗pow(E/(8+r),2)−2∗pow(E/(2+r),2)8 * pow(E / (8 + r), 2) - 2 * pow(E / (2 + r), 2)

Second way (general formula): expanding R1(R1+r)2=R2(R2+r)2\dfrac{R_1}{(R_1 + r)^2} = \dfrac{R_2}{(R_2 + r)^2} gives (R1−R2)(r2−R1R2)=0(R_1 - R_2)(r^2 - R_1R_2) = 0; since R1≠R2R_1 \ne R_2, r2=R1R2=8×2=16r^2 = R_1R_2 = 8 \times 2 = 16, r=4 Ωr = 4\ \Omega ✓. Numeric check: with E=12E = 12 V, I1=1212=1I_1 = \dfrac{12}{12} = 1 A, I2=126=2I_2 = \dfrac{12}{6} = 2 A; 12×8=22×2=81^2 \times 8 = 2^2 \times 2 = 8 W ✓.

Physical plausibility: r=4 Ωr = 4\ \Omega is positive and lies between the two loads. If rr were very small, the terminal voltage ≈E\approx E for both, and the smaller resistor 2 Ω2\ \Omega would always take the larger power (E2R\dfrac{E^2}{R}); if rr were very large, the current ≈Er\approx \dfrac{E}{r} for both, and the larger resistor 8 Ω8\ \Omega would take the larger power (I2RI^2R) — somewhere between, they must be equal ✓.

Unit check: V2⋅ΩΩ2=V2Ω=W\dfrac{\text{V}^2 \cdot \Omega}{\Omega^2} = \dfrac{\text{V}^2}{\Omega} = \text{W} ✓; the unit of r=R1R2r = \sqrt{R_1R_2} is Ω\Omega ✓.

Conclusion

r=8×2=4 Ωr = \sqrt{8 \times 2} = 4\ \Omega

From 8E2(8+r)2=2E2(2+r)2\dfrac{8E^2}{(8 + r)^2} = \dfrac{2E^2}{(2 + r)^2}, 2(2+r)=8+r2(2 + r) = 8 + r: the internal resistance r=4 Ωr = 4\ \Omega — the answer is (2).

Ignoring the internal resistance and assuming the same potential difference EE appears across both resistors.

The internal resistance is in series with the external resistance: I=ER+rI = \dfrac{E}{R + r}, so the terminal potential difference changes with RR.

தமிழ் · සිංහල